tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12359982.post112337729185953373..comments2023-10-06T07:28:21.803-04:00Comments on Cuban-American Pundits: Essays from a Cuban-American Perspective: Why tyrants remain in powerVal Prietohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15857729823069869008noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12359982.post-1123593411300010412005-08-09T09:16:00.000-04:002005-08-09T09:16:00.000-04:00Dearest anonymous,The answer to your question, int...Dearest anonymous,<BR/><BR/>The answer to your question, into Liendo being a Chavez supporter, is quite simple. In reading the article, nay, in simply reading the quote that I took from the article you will see the following words: <STRONG>But Chavez SUPPORTER Jose Liendo... said...</STRONG> If that isn't clear, then what is?<BR/><BR/>Now, you claim: <BR/><BR/><STRONG>Your argument that Chavez isAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12359982.post-1123531568525547272005-08-08T16:06:00.000-04:002005-08-08T16:06:00.000-04:00In the U.S. there is stability regardless of which...In the U.S. there is stability regardless of which candidate wins. As a Republican, I thought the world was going to end when Clinton was elected. It didn't. And neither will it end with Bush (for those Democrats out there). Our country, by virtue of the dispersion of power inherent in our system is very stable. That's unfortunately not the case in Latin America where people gravitate towardHenry Louis Gomezhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03167391252653145914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12359982.post-1123513133682811952005-08-08T10:58:00.000-04:002005-08-08T10:58:00.000-04:00How do you determine that Mr. Liendo "is obviously...How do you determine that Mr. Liendo "is obviously against Chavez" in the AP article?<BR/><BR/>Your argument that Chavez is in power because people want stability at any cost could equally apply to the U.S. presidential election in 2004.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com