Come one and come all and come quickly before it’s gone!

That’s right, you too should visit the world’s finest circus that is Cuba before Fidel is dead and Obama drops the embargo! Hurry. Yes, hurry! Come to the paradise of car collectors. The haven of Anti-American sentiment. The center of cigar aficionados. The tropical hub of human meat marketing, where flesh thirsty tourists can have their fill of sultry, sexy, and lets not forget savage, Cuban prostitutes.

And what about the artistically inclined?

Fear not! There is still room for you as the decrepit and poorly cared for remnants of the colonial old world stands on rotting wood and broken concrete. After all, isn’t any art best with age? Isn’t the finest of wines the oldest of wines? Does it really matter that these two analogies don’t fit, because in the end you're really visiting the most original work in the tropics: Castro communism in all its damning glory.

If that is not appeasing enough, you can visit the Cuban music halls sipping Son like some deep overproof rum. Perhaps Trova is more your thing? Maybe you like the raw and raunchy Rumba of la calle! Whatever your preference, whatever you desire, know that all art in Cuba is too created by the original artist that is Castro who inseminates the expression of the Cuban people into one collective communistic catastrophe.

And speaking of communism let’s not forget la revolucion!

On every corner. Down every street. On every entry door and living room there is the static reminder of a time long past. A reminder of a nation so thoroughly duped by grandiose lies and merciless assassinations. That’s right, these are the images of Fidel and the images of Che--the architects of what Cuba is today. These are the two men who were brave enough to seek a helping hand from the USA to stand up against the mob-encrusted Batista, only to then become the greatest cowards in history hiding behind senseless acts of violence, collective mental abuse, and giving blame to the one country that helped these bearded ones into power--America.

Come one and come all and come quickly before it’s gone. Cuba is a paradise for anyone who desires to sip exotic Anti-American and Anti-Democratic vintage at its finest.

And what of the colorful, always smiling, people on this esoteric oasis?

What does it matter to you! Take their pictures and wave your holas. Their struggle, political desensitization, and cultural asphyxiation will have no affect with your walks on the white sandy beaches and flirty sips of mojitos. Cuba was made for you! You are Cuba's true citizen. Cuban’s love tourists and you will be accommodated accordingly.

Come one and come all and come quickly before it's gone! Though Cuban oppression isn’t going to change anytime soon, your trip may lose all its far away flavor as the political environment turns with Obama now on the scene and Fidel soon to walk off.

Don’t miss out!

November 22, 1963

By George L. Moneo

I was a second grader in Mrs. Mudre's class at St. Mary's Cathedral School, my parochial school here in Miami. The day started as all days back then did. I have no memory of it save that it was my birthday and I was expecting lots of presents when my class celebrated it later that afternoon. We had a Cowboys & Indians theme party and I received a great present -- a gun that fired plastic bullets -- that was a very cool plastic western Colt .44. It worked great and you could reload it just like the Cowboys in the movies. We sang songs, my classmates sang happy birthday, we ate cake and stuff, and all was right with the world. I was seven years old! When the dismissal bell rang, we formed our usual line to wait for our parents.

It was around between 2:30 PM, Miami time, on Friday, November 22, 1963.

The nuns who ran the school -- for the life of me I can only remember the name of one of them, the principal, Sister Mary Esther -- stopped us as we were leaving and said that we had to go to church to pray because something terrible had happened. I know that I showed the gun they had given me to my mom and she quickly told me to put it away. We went to church and prayed for, what seemed to my seven-year old mind, hours and hours and hours. I vaguely remember hearing that the President had been shot. What did I know? I sort of knew that the President was a Roman Catholic like I was. All I knew was that I had a great present and I couldn't wait to go home to play with it.

That day, and the three days that followed, would, of course be forever etched in my mind. The black and white TV was on in our house for what seemed all the time. Nothing was on the TV except that the President had been shot. My mother and father, grandfather and grandmother, all looking very, very serious. On Sunday, November 24, I saw Jack Ruby kill Lee Harvey Oswald on TV. Live. Ruby yelled, "Oswald!" and pow! Oswald went down. What did I know? I was seven. I thought I was watching a movie that lasted all weekend long. And I saw the funeral on Monday. The haunting drums that kept the pace for the escorting of the caisson carrying the President's body still gives me goose bumps when I hear them.

In the intervening years, November 22, has held a special significance for me. Not because it's my birthday -- I haven't had a birthday since when I haven't remembered the assassination -- but because of what it did to us, all of us, as a nation.

We were hurt badly that day.

And I became obsessed with the assassination. The theories about it have become a cottage trade, like spy novels or B-movies. I've read huge chunks of the Warren Commission Report. Its purposeful lies were promulgated to assuage a nation and to cover up the ineptitude -- or complicity? -- of the Federal agencies that failed to protect the President. I most definitely do not believe the "single-bullet" theory. I remember hearing about it this "magic bullet" in 1964 -- a year after the assassination. I was amazed at what that bullet had done! In my young mind, I was still thinking it was like a movie or a TV show. Over the last thirty years I've read books about the assassination by Anthony Summers, Mark Lane, David Lifton, Jim Marrs, Fletcher Prouty, Edward Jay Epstein, Gus Russo, and Henry Hurt; magazine articles and websites. I've seen hours upon hours of documentaries, all of them outlining their theories about what happened. I don't believe David Lifton's theory that the President's body was altered on Air Force One to reflect an entry wound to the back of the head instead of a frontal shot, but I do believe the autopsy was badly bungled by someone who was not a trained forensic pathologist. I don't believe that Connolly was the target of the attempt and the assassins missed. I don't believe Oliver Stone's JFK and its leftist paranoia of a right-wing cabal, although it is a cinematic tour de force. I don't believe it was the CIA: did they suddenly go from inept, after the disasters they had been involved in, to brilliantly efficient, and execute a complex murder almost flawlessly? I don't think so. And I've seen the Zapruder film over and over again, its gory images etched in my mind forever.

I still remember.

I have my own theories about what happened that day, but I'll keep them to myself. What is certain is that none of us will ever know the whole truth about the forces that came together on that beautiful sunny day in Dallas to murder the President.

No matter what I think of JFK -- his fear of fidel and his betrayal of our brothers on Playa Giron; the sordid deal he made with Kruschev in 1962 that effectively sold out the Cuban exiles in the United States (myself included) by effectively preventing us from taking military action against fidel; the dishonest, some might say criminal, way in which he was elected in 1960 -- the manner of his death, so public, shot like a rabid dog on a street in Dallas, in full view of all of us, young and old alike, is a trauma that has not healed.

On November 22, 1963, on my seventh birthday, our innocence died and our unbounded optimism was derailed. America has yet to fully recover from the shots fired in Dealey Plaza forty-five years ago today.

The day after

I read Granma the day after the election, you know, the dirty mouthpiece of Castro they call news. Yes, I read it from time to time looking for what is said, and more importantly, I look for what isn’t said. For many of us, the election of 2008 was a surprise. I was shocked to see Obama win, and knowing the praise that Castro has given him, I wanted to read what filth Granma was spewing.

One article. One homely article was given in homage to the President Elect. In many ways, Bush made more news on Granma than Obama did. For the first time, in a long time, in Granma I read an article on the US that did not mention the “Miami Mafia.” Nor was there mention of the US greedily and secretly wanting Cuba. Nothing. The favor, or shock, of Obama’s victory is so great that there are no canned complaints or exaggerated exaltations.

Interestingly enough, I found an archived article from the day before that was classic Granma. It was the bashing of McCain if he would win the Presidency. The article closed with the subheading: un voto que no vale gran cosa (a vote that is worthless). Reference was made to the 2000 election and how Gore had the White House stolen from him. This was the Popular vote vs. the Electoral vote schema, and how our electoral system is allegedly corrupt. There is no mention of this in Obama’s victory article. There is no Granma press coverage as there was when Bush won both times. The single article in Granma is sober. And as I think about it, isn’t it clear that though Castro may find su media naranja in Obama, having a black man as a US President spits in the eye of Castro’s Revolution. I’m postulating that Granma’s initial reaction is sober because it shows that in the US we can have a black president, while the Cuba after Castro is still run by old white men. Granted this scenario would have been sweeter for me had Alan Keyes, and not Obama, been the first African-American president.

The US was at one time was more racist than Cuba. In the fifties US racism was at a height and yet Cuba had a mulatto President. Castro came with a promise to uplift the colored in Cuba, and instead he equally oppressed everyone. Now the Cuban cabinet is mainly white, and in the US we have a mulatto President elect. Let’s not be fooled by Castro’s past acclaims for Obama. This is not the scenario he had hoped for in the election. Any mulatto oppressed in Cuba can now look at the US and question why a white bearded man has Governed and oppressed him and his family for almost 50 years. Also, Obama’s openness to relations with Cuba is something that Castro does not want. As crucial as the Embargo has been to hurt Castro, Castro has been using the Embargo to scapegoat his failure. The threat of an Embargo lifting leaves Castro without an excuse. It would have been easier to have a Republican to throw blame on and expose how “corrupt” is the US electoral system. Yet Obama’s win shows how our democracy works. It’s not about the few in Miami; it’s about the American people and how this country is handled. Bush failed to handle his presidency well, and because of that many people threw the blame on the party and voted against Republican. Castro has failed Cuba and no matter how many “elections” happen on the island it is clear for the Cuban people that their vote is, un voto que no vale gran cosa.

Many are skeptical and fearful about Obama. However, Obama became President through our system and our political system is greater than any individual. Our voice, our action, and our resolve is what guides this nation –not the whim of one man. America is where the cutting edge of history happens, and it happens because the people have a voice. This is something that Castro could never grasp, and something that no President can ever take away from us unless we allow it with closed mouths. Obama will have it tough –we will not be quiet on issues that endanger our country and our people. And let’s not be so sure of Castro’s acceptance of Obama; our President elect can easily become a figure for Castro’s failure in Cuba.

It is silence, and not one man, that will be the death of our democracy.

The danger within

By George L. Moneo

I didn't watch the debate last night.

Why, you may ask yourselves, would someone who writes for political blogs not watch one of the lynchpin events of this political season? I’m angry as hell with this whole process.

Last night I came home to a house smelling of my wife's delicious Cuban style meatballs she was almost finished cooking. My son had finished his homework and was putzing around the house with the cat. I sat down at my Mac and opened my email inbox and saw that I had received the Evans/Novak report as I do every week. The news in it for Republicans was dire: A possible Dem Senate filibuster majority, losing as many as 20 seats in the House, Obama ahead in the polls, yada, yada, yada. I don't know why this particular email hit me as hard as it did but I got so damn angry inside that after dinner and before the debate I told my wife, rather agitatedly, that I’d rather not watch it. She could give me her report card afterwards.

I am thoroughly disgusted and disappointed with President Bush’s actions in reaction to the economic crisis. He has opened the door to socialism in this country as though he were Bernie Sanders himself. My utter disgust, though, is reserved for the actual culprits of this disaster. Democrats -- why don't we just call them what they are: Marxists -- who have not been held accountable by a media who is supposed to be the bulwark of a free society. You know who actually spoke the truth about our economic disaster? A comedy-variety show, for crying out loud!

I’m so disgusted at the members of my party who seem to have forgotten their core conservative principles in exchange for short-term political gain. Where are the Reagan Republicans and the Reagan Democrats? Where are the Republicans who crafted the “Contract With America”? Where are all of us who stand for something in this country, who stand for the true American principles of liberty, property, self-reliance and decency? Where the hell are they?

Do you realize how they have rigged this game to prevent us from winning? How malevolent forces have allied and conspired to deny the Americans a real choice in this election? How the unethical, almost criminal, behavior of our alleged “free press” has become so dangerous to the future of this country that no hyperbole can describe it? Last night, before one word had been uttered at the debate, there were pundits already beginning the meme of “Obama Wins The Debate”! Add to that, the overtly conspiratorial, and utterly disingenuous, lack of curiosity on the part of the mainstream media to investigate legitimate concerns about a candidate running for the highest office in the land!

  • Item: Did you all know Obama represented ACORN and trained for them and that he donated almost a million dollars to one their front companies. He denies it, but the the documentation exists.
  • Item: Obama’s Marxist mentors, Davis and Ayers, and his virulently racist Black Liberation Theology ally Wright. What are we to make of these alliances?
  • Item: Obama’s US Senate record, a big fat ZERO except for raising taxes every chance he got.
  • Item: Obama’s Illinois voting record that clearly shows his support of, not only infanticide, but of his desire to teach sex education to pre-K students.
  • Item: the missing time in Obama’s CV, around the time he was supposed to be at Columbia University, where many people don’t even remember him.
  • Item: Obama, his campaign, and the DNC, not being forthcoming with documentation about his origins.
  • And on, and on, and on.

Folks, America is in danger. This grand experiment, concocted a little over 232 years by a group of tax dissenters, may be on the verge of changes that will leave it mortally wounded. This is nothing less than a struggle for the survival of our country and our country’s values which each generation bequeaths to the next. What will my wife and I say to my son? What will my sister say to my niece? “Sorry, we screwed up America for you. We’re sorry this is not the America that once was” and leave it at that? Are we willing to elect a man who espouses the keystone Marxist principle of wealth redistribution? A man who for the twenty years of his public life has allied himself with the most despicable, vile, anti-American traitors and seditionists.

For the first time in my life I know what my mother and grandparents must have felt in 1958 before the abyss opened up and swallowed Cuba. I don’t think my comparison is wrong. The only difference with today is that in Cuba in 1958, only a few people knew fidel was a Marxist; today, the evidence is overwhelming, if you only want to look at it, that Barack Obama is just that. To all of you who support this man, with your smug attitudes, your narrow vision, your wanton stupidity, and your ignorance; you, and only you, will be held accountable by history for the demise of this country if Obama and his minions get elected to a majority and succeed in remaking America in their image and likeness.

Are we willing to give our country up? Wake up! Keep fighting! We have nineteen days left in this battle and we have to win!

I remind all of you of the words of Abraham Lincoln, speaking in 1838 before the Young Men's Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois, when he said, "From whence shall we expect the approach of danger? Shall some trans-Atlantic military giant step the earth and crush us at a blow? Never. All the armies of Europe and Asia . . . could not by force take a drink from the Ohio River or make a track on the Blue Ridge in the trial of a thousand years. No, if destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of free men we will live forever or die by suicide."

May Almighty God help us in this fight.

McCain vs. McCain

By now everyone is familiar with the multiple narratives that John McCain has written for himself. He’s effectively positioned himself as a no-holds-barred corruption fighter. Agree or not with the McCain-Feingold Act it’s clear that McCain’s intent was to remove some of what he considers to be the corrupting influence of money in the political process. It’s arguable that the bill sent money underground to so-called 527 groups that really aren’t accountable to anyone, but that’s really beside the point. McCain really does want to clean up politics.


The other major character trait that McCain promotes about himself is his willingness to put party interests aside and reach across the aisle to engage Democrats for the good of the country. This trait irritates many Republicans because he seems to accept many of the premises set forth by liberal Democrats such as the devout belief that humans are causing global warming. But it’s undeniable that McCain has (much more than Obama) has collaborated with members of the opposing party to sponsor legislation. The aforementioned McCain-Feingold Act along with McCain-Kennedy and McCain-Lieberman bills attest to that fact. John McCain has made it a point to reach out to Democratic voters and tell them “it’s not a party thing, it’s an America thing.”

Ideologically McCain cannot be called a conservative. His brand of politics is a personal one that blends some conservative elements, populist elements and even liberal elements. McCain has not been afraid to play the class warfare card that conservatives despise and often talks about greed in corporate America. American business has had much better friends over the years than John McCain. McCain voted against both Bush tax cuts because he said they disproportionately helped the wealthy. Don’t tell that to the wealthy though because their proportional burden has actually increased since 2002.

But what happens when McCain’s multiple narratives collide?

As we have seen in recent weeks the financial market in America is in the midst of a catastrophe. It’s a very complicated issue and not one that materialized overnight, not even in the last eight years. The seeds of this crisis were planted during the Carter administration signed the Community Reinvestment Act into law. Without getting into too much detail, because others have already reported on this much better than I could, the crisis really began to take shape when, prompted by the Clinton administration, two Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac started to grow dramatically, ultimately controlling about 50% of the U.S. mortgage market. This was a government-protected monopoly that set the pace and tone for the entire mortgage industry.

There were warning signs along the way that many ignored. Articles like this one in the New York Times (1999) and this one (2000) in City Journal attest to that. But Fannie and Freddie had become a major lobby in Washington. A weak regulator was not able to rein them in and when he tried to ask congress for help, some members of the committee responsible for overseeing them browbeat him.

John McCain himself proposed increased regulation on Fannie and Freddie and it was blocked.

In last Friday’s presidential debate, Barack Obama blamed the crisis on conservative ideology of deregulation and eight years of the Bush administration pushing that agenda. There’s only one problem with that point of view. It’s totally backward. As quasi-public institutions conservatives were screaming for more regulation of Fannie and Freddie. This crisis is not a failure of a market economy running wild; it’s a failure of government intervention in what had previously been mainly a private market, combined with too little oversight. While Barack Obama was playing the partisan blame game and getting it wrong, McCain stood there and took the punch and didn’t swing back. The question for many observers was: why?

Fannie and Freddie are probably the most graphic examples of the type of government corruption that John McCain detests. These two GSEs spent fortunes on lobbying and were protected by members of the House and Senate that were supposed to be their watchdogs. The problem for John McCain is that the guilty were almost all Democrats. Democrats like Barney Frank and Senate colleagues of McCain’s like Chris Dodd. Remember McCain is supposed to be the guy who doesn’t take cheap shots at his congressional pals.

John McCain’s narratives that once seemed to peacefully coexist suddenly came into conflict. Would McCain the corruption fighter come out and give Americans some straight talk? Would he explain that Democrats (with the aid of some Republicans) were influenced by big dollar contributions from Freddie and Fannie where executives made multimillion-dollar fortunes as they quietly destroyed the American economy? Would he explain that it was well intended liberal ideology that led to inevitable unintended consequences? Would he explain that conservatives want less regulation in private business but tons of accountability and oversight in the public sector, which is where Fannie and Freddie really resided despite protestations to the contrary? Or would the non-ideological bipartisan McCain win the internal struggle and allow this golden opportunity to set the record straight pass?

Until now it's been the collegial McCain that we've seen and no straight talk about the depth of corruption that exacerbated the crisis.

One blogger suspects that McCain has been holding back while waiting for passage of the bailout bill out of fear of derailing it and that now that’s is been passed that he will finally take Obama to the mat. After all, Franklin Raines, one of Obama’s economic advisers cashed in to the tune of $90 million for his time as Fannie Mae’s CEO.

McCain’s campaign has released one new TV commercial that begins to tackle the issue of placing blame where it rightfully belongs, but to date the candidate has been silent. Sarah Palin has done her part reassuring America of her aptitude and energized the conservative base of the Republican Party. Now it’s McCain’s turn to tell the moderate Americans who are undecided what the true differences would be between a McCain administration and an Obama administration. If McCain the corruption fighter doesn’t start making the corrupt Democrats such as Barney Frank, who aided in the creation of this mess, famous (as he's promised to do with earmark spenders) then the election is lost, and those responsible for this crisis will never be held accountable because nobody will be there to hold their feet to the fire.

September 11, 2001

by George L. Moneo

Seven years.

The tears still well up and my body tenses with anger whenever I see footage of that morning. Last weekend, in preparation for this anniversary, I steeled myself and watched the Fox News and ABC News coverage of the event as archived here. This has become part of my ritual every year since the first anniversary; I don't ever want to forget what happened that morning. And seven years on, nothing has changed, the feelings are the same. September 11, 2001 is the watershed event of the second half of my life.

Much has happened in America since that day. Our national mood is foul, if you believe the media. Critical to understanding the real psyche of the American people today are three things. One, we have had no further attacks on US soil. I credit the Bush Administration's proactive approach to defending us against terrorist threats using any and every method available. The left's protestations that our rights have been diminished are nothing more than gaslight; if it were true, thousands of them would be in Federal prisons for treason, providing aid and comfort to our enemies, or both. Two, our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have, for better or worse, defined our task in the larger war on Islamic terrorism around the world. These two wars, necessary for many geo-strategic reasons, have been shamelessly used by the left as a wedge to divert attention from a fight that will continue long after President Bush leaves office. Three, the left in this country has made our national interest a bit player in a farce where they oppose the war, shed crocodile tears about the troops fighting the good fight, all the while comparing them to Nazi storm troopers, call for peace, and shout snappy slogans. I’ll leave it to someone else to diagnose the mental illness that makes you hate your country so much you want its enemies to win.

This iteration of our war with radical Islam began almost thirty years ago, on November 4, 1979, in Tehran. Then came the Marine Corps barracks in Beirut in 1983, the Achille Lauro in 1985, TWA Flight 103 in 1988, the First Gulf War in 1990, a cold and snowy February 26, 1993 when the World Trade Center was attacked by Ramzi Yousef and the apostles of the blind Sheik Rahman, the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996, the US Embassies in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998, on the same day, within minutes of each other (two acts of war), the attack on the USS Cole in 2000 (yet another act of war, as if the previous two were insufficient for the appeasers and the hand-wringers). All of these events preceded the events in New York City seven years ago. It’s not as though we weren’t warned.

On that Tuesday morning seven years ago, so clear and blue, I was freelancing at a nationally-known retail company that owns hundreds of stores in malls all over the United States. Two of those were large retail stores in the lower malls of the North and South Towers of the World Trade Center. I had been hired to write some new manuals and specification documents and to tweak some technical documentation. It was my sixth month there, and it was to be the penultimate month the corporation would be headquartered in Miami-Dade County; it was moving to the mid-west with the usual lay-offs, transfers, resignations, and tears. My consulting gig was scheduled to end on the last day of September. The mood was already depressed and sullen.

I was in the office they had assigned to me, having coffee and reading emails. A little after 9:00 AM a CNN news bulletin arrived in my email inbox that said that a small airplane had crashed into the World Trade Center. I immediately logged on to CNN.com and saw the breaking news flash on the home page. Frankly, I didn’t suspect anything; I knew about the B-25 bomber that had crashed into the Empire State Building in the 1940s and I went along with what the initial reporting had to say. My mom called to tell me the video and pictures she was seeing on CNN so I started to follow the event closely. By 9:20, after the second plane struck, amid the frantic bulletins being put out by CNN, I realized what had happened. My phone calls became frantic. I called my wife who had been organizing a huge event at her work to go to the nearest television to see what was happening. I felt helpless and angry. We were under attack again, this time in a unprecedented fashion.

I was able to get to the already packed lunchroom on the ground floor where a large television set bolted to the wall was displaying horrifying images. Both buildings on fire, the smoke, and those poor people trapped on the upper floors. Some of the employees who were in store operations started calling the two stores in the North and South towers. We heard, through the grapevine the crowded lunchroom had become, that the employees were confused because they had been told to evacuate, then to stay, then to leave, again. Screams had been heard during those telephone calls. My mind can scarcely imagine what was behind those screams. With about fifty other people, I saw the first tower collapse. The sound of uncontrollable sobbing surrounded me. I was in a state of shocked disbelief. I didn't know what to feel and what to do. I went outside to clear my head and think while smoking a cigarette. My wife was not answering her cell phone. Around 10:15 I answered a call from my sister-in-law. She was in the service at the time and living in Maryland. I'll never forget her words: "George, they're attacking the Pentagon! What the hell is going on?"

After 11:00 AM the company let most of the non-IT employees and contractors go home. My wife's project, a project she had worked her ass off to organize for months, had been cancelled. I went to pick up our then five-year old son who had been dismissed early from his kindergarten class. After my wife arrived home, a little after two that afternoon, she and I spent the next ten hours (and the days after that) watching the news coverage, seeing the carnage, and that terrible, terrible sight of smoke rising over those smoldering ruins. We saw the second airplane hitting the tower and the resultant orange and black fireball. We saw the footage of the people running away from the Towers, covered in gray dust, some in dust and blood, and of the people jumping to their deaths as the favorable option to burning alive. We saw the first tower collapse. We saw the second tower collapse. My wife gasped when she saw the replay of the towers collapsing; she had not seen it happen live. We saw the carnage at the Pentagon. We saw what remained of the heroes of Flight 93 in a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. But the ruins, those awful ruins of what had been there hours and days before, those I think, will be the signal images of that day for me. We cried, together. We were witnesses to a seminal moment in history.

Since that day I've listened to countless stories from friends, acquaintances and colleagues who were there, in New York City, near Ground Zero. The story that affected me most was told to me by one of my best friends. Because of a fortuitous desire to have a real breakfast, he, along with his partner, were running late for a 9:00 AM meeting with the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, then headquartered in the World Trade Center.

"George," he recounted, "that day remains so clear in my mind's eye I can relive it almost at will. It was like being in an episode of the Twilight Zone. Around 9:30 that night we were walking down Lexington Avenue towards 49th Street, trying to find a place to have a bite, and we were the only people on the street. Imagine that! Midtown Manhattan and we were alone, everything was closed. I saw people sleeping in hotel lobbies who had not been able to go home. Eerie doesn't come close to describing it." He went on to tell me, with emotion in his voice, that the folks they were meeting that day became like family, concerned as he was with whether they had survived or not. Ironically, the only one scheduled to meet with them that did not survive that day was John O’Neill, ex-FBI and the new head of security for the Port Authority.

I visited and marveled at these structures, I went to the observation deck to view New York City in all its glory. I ate at Windows on the World. I shopped in the malls under the buildings and then caught the train back to mid-town. Every time I see a movie where the Twin Towers are featured in a long shot I seethe. The New York skyline is incomplete. The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan weren't just buildings, they were symbols of American ingenuity, of our know-how, of our indomitable can-do attitude, of our unapologetic capitalism. Those two great American symbols died on September 11. Only the future will tell us what else we lost on that day.

The 9/11 Commission wrote that our government exhibited a failure of the imagination in not seeing the warning signs that had been pointing inexorably to the attacks of 9/11. I agree. But, the American people are guilty as well. Most of us tend to live our lives in such a way that we want -- no we demand! -- bad news to go away. We want to live in a bubble, living our lives in hopeful optimism, being happy, having fun. Please, don't bother us with all that negative stuff, okay? We just want to be left alone to follow our bliss. But the last time we could afford to feel that was on September 10, 2001.

On September 11 we came face to face with an implacable, ruthless, and merciless enemy that has sworn itself to our destruction and the destruction of Western Civilization. It has been working at it for almost 14 centuries. It doesn't matter what country that threat comes from: whether Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Libya. Or whether it's Hezbollah, Hamas, or the PLO. It doesn't matter whether it comes from within our own borders and the radical mosques we dutifully ignore so as not to offend. It doesn't matter what flavor it is, whether Sunni, Shia, Salafist, Wahhabi, secular Baathist. It doesn't matter. What matters is that we cannot ignore the danger that we, our children, and our children’s children, will face well into the twenty-first century.