Wednesday, March 14, 2007

McCain, a Democrat in Republican clothes?

I used to like John McCain. Before I got to know John McCain, that is. When you dig deeper into his rhetoric and his votes in the senate, you find a pattern that is, well, liberal. I discovered this during the campaign for the presidency in 2000.

Well, the Club for Growth published a summary of their most recent white paper on 2008 presidential hopefuls in yesterday's WSJ. And it's not good news for McCain, who is a darling of the MSM. Here's some of the most relevant excerpts:

Sen. McCain was one of only two Republican senators to oppose the 2001 tax cuts and one of only three GOP senators to oppose the 2003 reductions. Furthermore, his reason for opposing the cuts was taken straight from the playbook of the most radical left-wing Democrats. In 2001, Sen. McCain argued, "I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief."

That statement is virtually indistinguishable from the class-warfare demagoguery used by Democrats like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. More importantly, it was grossly inaccurate. The Bush tax cuts lowered income taxes, and other taxes, for every American who paid them. In percentage terms, lower-income workers enjoyed the greatest savings, and today, upper-income workers pay a larger share of total income taxes than they did before the Bush tax cuts.

Sen. McCain did much more than just criticize the Bush tax cuts--he also joined leading liberal senators in offering and voting for amendments designed to undermine them. All in all, he voted on the pro-tax side of 14 such amendments in 2001 and 2003. These included an amendment he co-sponsored with Sen. Tom Daschle to limit the rate reduction in the top tax bracket to one percentage point and an amendment sponsored by Sen. Russ Feingold against full repeal of the estate tax, aka the death tax. This latter vote is in keeping with Senator McCain's 2002 vote against repealing the death tax.

Over the years, Sen. McCain has supported a number of other big-government bills, including an amendment that would authorize the government to set prices on prescription drugs under Medicare and an amendment to prohibit oil drilling in part of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

But of all his infringements on personal freedom, Sen. McCain's persistent attacks on political speech are the most worrisome. The First Amendment is an important safeguard of pro-growth policies. When government strays from sound economic policies, citizens must be free to exercise their constitutional rights to petition and criticize those policies and the politicians responsible for them. The 2002 McCain-Feingold bill (or the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act), named in part for the Arizona senator who gave it life, seeks to squash political dissent by imposing grossly unconstitutional restrictions on citizen participation in political debate.

In defense of the bill's provision severely limiting the freedom of private groups to run political TV ads, Sen. McCain argued in a Supreme Court brief, "These ads are direct, blatant attacks on the candidates. We don't think that's right." He thus anointed himself the arbiter of appropriate political speech, worthy of deciphering which speech is "right" and which should be permitted in American political debate. His law constitutes the greatest modern infringement of the First Amendment right to political free speech. While bestowing significant advantages upon incumbent office holders, it has created neither a less corrupt political domain nor a more democratic one.

While Sen. McCain's economic record is clearly mixed, a careful study demonstrates that even his pro-growth positions tend to be tainted by a heavy anti-growth undercurrent. This evidence, and the virulence of his rhetoric, suggest that American taxpayers cannot expect consistently pro-growth economic policies from a McCain administration.
No wonder the media loves this guy so much. The full report is available by clicking here.

4 comments:

Rick said...

Aw, c'mon, Henry. Conservatives love liberals! Just look at Rudy.

Srcohiba said...

McCain is an anomoly as evidenced by his support for the war (although he made a gaff the other day saying those killed were wasted). And he's pro life.

I don't mind the ANWR vote and I actually supported the price negotiation on medicare. Ask any old lady or old man on a fixed income and they'll agree on that one.

But the McCain/Feingold was a disaster and assault on the 1st amendment. Everyone gets around it with 501 groups and yet legit groups are restricted.

But the US Supreme Court upheld the law so we're stuck with it absent it's sunset or repeal.

I still favor Rudy thus far and I'd be apt to go for Newt if he joins. But the rest of the pot on the GOP is pretty lame. On the Dem side, other than Richardson, who I'd consider, is the only one worthwhile as well.

Henry Gomez said...

Rick is half right. Rudy is a liberal.

And I don't like price controls regardless of how they are disguised.

I'm a newt guy myself.

El Guardia Rural said...

I like Rudy more for his leadership abilities than for his politics. But if you are looking for innovative ideas and a strong conservative philosophy Newt is definitely the man. Let's see what future debates have in store for us. McCain is definitely not for me.